Ben Shapiro recently created a storm on Twitter with his latest rant, but it turns out that his argument is totally off base. The conservative pundit unleashed a series of tweets about the current state of American politics aimed at liberals and progressives, but his claims don’t stand up to scrutiny. In this blog post, we’ll examine why Ben Shapiro’s Twitter rant is misguided and fails to make any valid points.


He’s wrong about the First Amendment.

Ben Shapiro’s recent Twitter rant was focused on what he views as censorship of conservative voices on social media platforms. He argued that the platforms are violating the First Amendment by suspending accounts. However, this argument is completely off base.
The First Amendment does protect freedom of speech and press, but it doesn’t give anyone a free pass to say whatever they want without any consequence. Private companies like Twitter can set rules for how their users should behave and take action when those rules are violated.
Furthermore, the First Amendment only applies to the government and its agents, not private companies. The idea that Twitter must abide by the First Amendment is absurd because it is not a governmental entity. Therefore, Twitter’s actions to suspend or ban certain accounts are perfectly legal and do not violate anyone’s right to free speech.


His argument against cancel culture is weak.

Ben Shapiro recently made waves on Twitter when he posted a rant about cancel culture and the First Amendment. In his post, he proclaimed that cancelling culture violates our right to freedom of speech. However, Ben Shapiro’s argument against cancel culture is weak.
First of all, it’s important to note that cancel culture isn’t an infringement on anyone’s First Amendment rights. Cancelling someone, or boycotting their work, is a form of expression. It’s how we can express our dissatisfaction with someone or something, and it’s within our legal rights. Ben Shapiro’s ben Shapiro Twitter rant misrepresents this fact.
Additionally, cancel culture isn’t about silencing people. It’s about highlighting controversial views, opinions, or behaviours and holding those people accountable for them. People aren’t being prevented from expressing themselves; their past words or actions are being addressed and held to a higher standard. The goal is to keep everyone quiet but to ensure that offensive ideas are not given a platform.
Ultimately, Ben Shapiro’s argument against cancel culture is weak because he fails to understand the nuances of the situation. His ben Shapiro Twitter rant completely misrepresents what cancel culture is and what it stands for. People can express their disagreement with others’ views, but they shouldn’t be silenced for their beliefs.


He needs to understand how Twitter works.

Ben Shapiro recently took to Twitter to rant about how the First Amendment was under attack and that cancel culture was ruining everything. Unfortunately, he must understand how Twitter works or the First Amendment itself.
First, Twitter is a private company and has the right to decide what content can be posted on its platform. The First Amendment only applies to government censorship, not private companies like Twitter. Therefore, his argument that the First Amendment is being violated is completely off base.
Moreover, Twitter has the right to set its own rules and regulations. If Twitter does not like your content, it can take it down or suspend your account for violating its guidelines. Ben Shapiro seems to have forgotten this very important detail as he is claiming that his free speech is being infringed upon when it’s simply a case of him violating Twitter’s policies.
It’s clear that Ben Shapiro needs to understand how Twitter works and his arguments against cancel culture are misguided at best. His tweets are nothing more than a vain attempt to seek attention, which isn’t necessarily wrong, but his reasoning is incorrect.


He’s being hypocritical.

Ben Shapiro’s Twitter rant has been widely criticized as hypocritical. After all, he has built his career on the same cancel culture he claims to be against. He is a well-known critic of other people’s views and beliefs and is quick to “cancel” anyone who disagrees with him.
It’s also worth noting that Shapiro has a long history of blocking people on social media and cutting off conversations when it suits him. In the past, he has called for the silencing of controversial figures such as Louis Farrakhan while simultaneously arguing against the “cancelling” of voices he agrees with.
In short, Ben Shapiro’s Twitter rant comes across as hypocritical and insincere, given his involvement in the same cancel culture he claims to be fighting against. His arguments don’t hold up to scrutiny, and it’s clear he’s just trying to stir up controversy for attention.


He’s just looking for attention.

Ben Shapiro recently sparked a controversy with his Twitter rant against cancel culture. While there is certainly reason to debate the merits and issues surrounding this topic, Shapiro’s arguments have been largely off base. One of the biggest issues with his rant is that he appears to be looking for attention more than offering any real insight into the topic.
Shapiro’s Twitter tirade was filled with inflammatory language and rambling claims that lacked concrete evidence. This was an effort to draw attention to himself and to be seen as a major player in the conversation. While there is nothing wrong with wanting to express one’s opinion, Shapiro’s post went beyond what could be considered reasonable discourse and more resembled trolling.
The issue of cancel culture is complex, and it deserves more than the sweeping generalizations that Shapiro made. Instead of contributing something meaningful to the discussion, his main goal was to get attention and ensure people knew his name. As a result, he ended up detracting from the overall conversation and using a serious issue as a platform for his agenda.
It is important to remember that Ben Shapiro’s Twitter rant should not be taken as a serious commentary on the issue of cancel culture. He is simply looking for attention and has no real intention of engaging in an intellectual debate or making meaningful contributions to the discussion. To have a productive dialogue, we must all look beyond those simply trying to get attention and instead focus on those providing thoughtful and well-researched opinions.

By Admin